|
Post by tarzan on Dec 1, 2017 17:07:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Dec 3, 2017 19:46:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Dec 13, 2017 20:44:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Jan 1, 2018 14:45:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 1, 2018 19:11:59 GMT -5
I still hold to evolution, it is simple and it works, low cost, and you don't need modern technology that can mess up to do it. you let the viruses do what they will, the people left living and functional will be the ones that needed the lowest health care costs, and then they have kids that are more likely to not need high health care costs either no corruption or science errors can make it go wrong either
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Jan 1, 2018 19:45:36 GMT -5
big flaw with yr plan - no money in that approach except for funeral directors
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 1, 2018 20:11:53 GMT -5
the correct path is often not the path with the most money attached
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Jan 21, 2018 8:51:47 GMT -5
Jordan Sather@DestroyIllusion 22m 22 minutes ago
Vaccines work fantastic, you know.
Because they're real purpose is not to help us, but to poison and maim us.
And they do a damn good job at that.
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Jan 25, 2018 12:09:42 GMT -5
bolenreport.com/president-trump-drops-nuclear-bomb-vaccine-mandates/President Trump Drops NUCLEAR BOMB on Vaccine Mandates…With the establishment on Thursday of the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division in the Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights, Trump has laid the groundwork to smash every single vaccine mandate as well as turn BIG PHARMA into little pharma.
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Feb 2, 2018 16:53:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Feb 11, 2018 12:04:20 GMT -5
is this so? i'm a klutz on this language thingies it's from jim stone www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=93384Trump probably just killed vaccine mandates After taking care of his first batch of issues, he progressed onto the next by establishing a new federal office for vaccine freedom, which has the purpose of providing people a way out of vaccination easily via religious preference
OH MY GOD, READ THE TEXT. The legal text uses the words "unalienable rights", rather than "inalinable rights" which means this agency will operate under actual law, rather than legalese. This is a topic covered in Wayne's book Its Not the Law. It does make a difference, because if this wording is being used it probably means Trump's next step will be to kill off false statutes that operate under the color of law, rather than actual law. AWESOME. Bye bye asset forfeiture!
Take a look at this! HA HA HA HA HA, he's delivering! The Dems and the American bar association are going to puke.Ok, so here's the difference: If the word "inalenable" is used, it means you are (basically) in an admiralty court that can walk all over you. But just switching one letter, the i to a u, suddenly you have constitutionally enforceable rights that the court can't simply walk all over. This is EPIC, I cannot believe Trump did this so well. Let's see this sweep across all legislation. If it does, Americans won't be peons anymore!
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Feb 11, 2018 21:48:34 GMT -5
that word is used in a non legal document, so not sure the wording matters legally
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Feb 13, 2018 20:23:34 GMT -5
hey space, he's copied some of joseph farrell's article here but to read the article in question, one needs to sign in... strange how it's only in the past week or 2 that I have come across this medium.com but it's available elsewhere www.sgtreport.com/articles/2018/2/13/vaccine-meta-analysis-and-unknown-etiologiesVACCINE META-ANALYSIS AND “UNKNOWN ETIOLOGIES”Sometimes an article comes along that is so well-written and stunning in its implications that I hesitate to blog about it at all, and simply put it into the "tidbits" category in the hopes that people will read it. This article, shared by Mr. V.T., is one of those articles. Yet I think that if I were to do that people might not read it, and that would be bad. The problem is, however, that anything I might say would mar the implications of the article. The article is long, but the implications are wide and profound. In fact, it's an article that I strongly suspect some of you will save, it's that important, and that good. Nevertheless, I do want to say a few things about the article, both by way of introduction, and my usual commentary on one or two key paragraphs. I would ask that the reader read my blog first, or at least the section "About Meta-Analysis", and then the actual article. Here's the article: Diseases with Unknown Etiology Trace Back to Mass Vaccination Against Influenza in 1976
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Feb 17, 2018 10:40:05 GMT -5
www.healthnutnews.com/abc-experts-say-flu-shot-potentially-caused-the-flu-epidemic-shocker-in-mainstream-no-less/ABC: Experts say flu shot potentially caused the flu epidemic (Shocker, in mainstream no less)(Note from Erin: Good news! Not only is ABC news linked here, but so is NBC news who explains why the flu shot is “lousy” in their title, (see below) and basically “useless” to those over 65. Wake up America. Countless MDs (including the head of Cleveland Clinic) are calling out the dangerous adjuvants that can injure, harm and even kill you or your family in this dangerous ineffective vaccine.
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Feb 20, 2018 21:23:54 GMT -5
|
|