|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 12, 2017 18:02:49 GMT -5
maybe I should have got MgCO3 and the pure Mg but seems to me that the magnetic field is what does the polarizing in the arv would be much easier to use a crystal and drop the huge magnet to get the same effect.
I remember that there was talk of a crystal that messed with gravity when you put electricity to it (some guy at a lab told people about it) thought it was one of the Inorganic crystal scintillators (can't remember what one, but likely sodium iodide), but it was pink, and they normally don't show up pink, so it had something else going on in it that they could not figure out.
|
|
|
Post by jhpace1 on Jan 12, 2017 21:03:22 GMT -5
Hello folks, Balsaboy/gambeir invited me here, so here I am. I'm trying to follow this thread, but it's going to take a while. I'm currently distracted by myself writing several sci-fi novels and taking care of the parents. If the precious metal markets would break through to unheard-of levels that would help out financially as well. Or have 6+ people sign up for the travel website I'm with.
Anyway, the only thing I have to contribute so far is observation. Keep at it, spacecase0.
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 13, 2017 0:53:54 GMT -5
good to have you here would love any ideas you have when reading all this, would take me days to read all this if I just got here as well hope you enjoy it all
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 14, 2017 16:01:11 GMT -5
I am trying to figure out how to get a bismuth layer over the magnesium with little crystals on it without the crystals falling off, really don't want to have to electroplate the bismuth layer on one side at a time, and if I do, will it crystallize correctly, or will it match what it is plated onto (the magnesium)
maybe try and crush the crystals in to the magnesium and hope they stay there ? would I know if they fell off when I dip it in the liquid bismuth ?
think it needs to be bonded in any way ? maybe cast the bismuth in thin sheets with crystals inside (like melting it in a pan and mixing the crystals in and letting it harden in the pan) and then just wrap it over the magnesium ?
getting the bismuth/crystal mix on one side of the magnesium is not to hard, but getting it on each side at the same time is what has me wondering and mostly because it has to cool slowly for the crystals to change how the bismuth crystallizes
ideas ?
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 14, 2017 21:47:45 GMT -5
Hello folks, Balsaboy/gambeir invited me here, so here I am. I'm trying to follow this thread, but it's going to take a while. I'm currently distracted by myself writing several sci-fi novels and taking care of the parents. If the precious metal markets would break through to unheard-of levels that would help out financially as well. Or have 6+ people sign up for the travel website I'm with. Anyway, the only thing I have to contribute so far is observation. Keep at it, spacecase0. Yea, glad you made it here. Don't worry about reading all that stuff. Look at what you will and if it speaks to you, then you read it. That's where your individuality matters and see's what others cannot see. Often I am quite blind and make many mistakes which I'm quite sure are not errors; just oversights. *joking. Whenever you get complexity you have to reduce it to a simplicity. That is the way the human mind retains complexity, and the details are put in files in those hard to find long term data bases which so often vex us. 1. The Capacitors are capcitors. 2. They are simple in theory. 3. The materials are common. 4. Their diamagnetic quality is one key. 5. Their is another key and it's a Wave Guide. 6. Crystals provided a natural way to grow the wave guides in the material. 7. An applied magnetic field may alone be sufficient; Superconductive Magnet; if not then a moving/rotating magnetic field is needed. 8. The magnetic field, whatever it really is, is one way or another interacting with spacetime in such a way as to distort the immediate time field. 9. In Short: This is a spacetime tensor engineered drive system. That's what this system seems to be to me. None of this is so complex in general theory, and I'm not all that sure it is as complex as some would like to make it out to be. We are just going to have to fool around to see where it leads, but I think it's quite clear that we now have very solid grounds to work from. That is, the basic concepts which outlined the design are factual and real. There is no reason to think this will not work. In other words, we are no longer bamboozled, we aren't looking at something mysterious any longer. It's now a real machine we can understand logically like the car in the garage. If we can't make or replicate part of all of it then it's only because we have lack of funds, and some technical expertise, but it won't be because we don't understand it.
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 14, 2017 22:19:48 GMT -5
I am trying to figure out how to get a bismuth layer over the magnesium with little crystals on it without the crystals falling off, really don't want to have to electroplate the bismuth layer on one side at a time, and if I do, will it crystallize correctly, or will it match what it is plated onto (the magnesium) maybe try and crush the crystals in to the magnesium and hope they stay there ? would I know if they fell off when I dip it in the liquid bismuth ? think it needs to be bonded in any way ? maybe cast the bismuth in thin sheets with crystals inside (like melting it in a pan and mixing the crystals in and letting it harden in the pan) and then just wrap it over the magnesium ? getting the bismuth/crystal mix on one side of the magnesium is not to hard, but getting it on each side at the same time is what has me wondering and mostly because it has to cool slowly for the crystals to change how the bismuth crystallizes ideas ? Nope, I don't right now, but figuring that out is the next step. We have to do some digging about growing crystals, and crystal formation in metals. Now my guess is that they have a material that is synthetic that does what all these metals and crystals once did. After all, this has to be WWII Nazi Germany Technology. At least the theoretical understanding has to come from that epoch based on what I know. First off all the metals involved have natural wave guides that create this diamagnetism. The crystal is creating more of these wave guides. So like you have a 2hp lawn mower and now you're going put a supercharger on it get a 4hp law mower. So yea they are key it seems, so figuring this out is going to be a task. The other parts don't appear to be quite as problematic so far. I think one of the other keys here is the power of the magnetic field. If you used an electromagnet you could control that to a degree but it would probably be a stationary magnet, what with wires and all, so you could first start with a stationary capacitor plate. If you can't spin the magnetic field then spin the plate itself. That's the go round on that problem. What I wouldn't do though is put the electromagnet under the plate. Put it above mounted to something. Anything really. Some scrap lumber supports or whatever. I think first just make a capacitor from the materials. The start seeing what effects you get. Like if the capacitor is sitting on a scale with the magnetic field above you're going to be all set for reading any changes. ***Also remember. Never apply full power first....Right Jhpace1? And don't be reaching into that field either. We don't yet know what is going on.
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 15, 2017 1:26:10 GMT -5
These guys are the ones to note. This link here is one to look at closely. www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/8480-harvesting-energy-sun-using-crystals.htmlThere are many fantastic links and information at that link but... The upper ring was thought to possibly be an antenna. I've always considered it to be a superconductive magnet, but what do I know? A little less than half way down there's a post which is an automatic download. New Kinds of Fractal Antennas This looks like cross section of the drawings depiction of that upper ring which is shown in the cutaway. If you just google "Computational Modeling of New Kinds of Fractal Antennas" it should be the first PDF to pop up and it too is an auto download.
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 17, 2017 9:53:18 GMT -5
You two might be right about not using the term spacetime altogether. See what you think. Maybe we should call it time density.
Been giving all this some thoughts aimed at the time modification theme and the idea that time is like a density in that it is distance between particles; that time is manifested as a wave: We know that already, we just aren't really being told that, and you can see it if you think about a microwave as kind of time wave.
A wave form can induce spin states in matter/energies. The wave form of a microwave is separated by a filter that is a spiral vortex: Saying that the layer of the universe are time density layers, and the energies which may be part of another density layer can be accessed with the right filters. The structure of certain materials, such as crystal, act as a kind of gate keeper in universe to create layers of density which we call time. Which would seem to say these waves are the keys to unlocking energy. The zero point energy everyone blathers about.
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 17, 2017 12:06:40 GMT -5
I still think it should be called a time field, just like an electric field or a magnetic field
the more I look at the dimensions that smith lists, the more they seem correct to me. so lets have another look
dimension fabric 1 length (has a vector) 2 area (has a scale value) 3 volume
field fabric 4 time field (usually spin, and has a scale value) 5 divergent time field, or electric field (has a vector) 6 vector quality curl, or magnetic field (scale, vector, and orientation) he also says it is the dynamic aspect of reality perceived by awareness
control fabric 7 "random" (just like a magnetic field, but orientation that can be anything) 8 decision (free will) 9 sequence (order of specific arrangement )
perception fabric 10 form 11 multiplicity (form as a consequence, or aggregation ) 12 recognizable universe
he puts free will affecting (or creating) dimension number 8 and higher, I see other universes/realms (whatever you call them, and for got the sanskrit name) branching off in dimension number 9 (by the way, he has no idea what awareness is or where it hides) for verification. time, magnetic, and electric fields created by any reality will be detectable in any other realm and it would show why ghost hunters use magnetic and electric detectors, because they are shared forces
now when you go look at what he called the quadrature idea, then you get where crystals come into play. the quadrature idea is that 3 dimensions can change a 4th and crystals hold 2 of the dimensions (if not more) at complex fixed angles to each other.
what do you think ?
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 17, 2017 15:43:13 GMT -5
I think you are right entirely. I think I'm just now beginning to get a handle on the concepts such that I can visualize them. I think Smith really must have been on the same wave length we are on because I don't know how else you can come to see it until you start to tune in to these thoughts. He must have been a remarkable individual.
I didn't know anything about what was a quadrature. I've come across the word but couldn't really understand it's meaning, and still have a ways to go with grasping it and it's implications. Nor did I know what you've told me about the idea and how crystals hold two of the dimensions or more at complex angles, or that 3 dimension could change to a 4th. That's all new information to me.
I now think that you have a better understanding of what these crystals may be doing. What do you think (right now) that they might be doing? Don't worry about any of the things I've said. Say what you think. I've probably stumbled off into the weeds and lost the scent of the trail, but I do think though that we are on the right track: Bumbling and all, but still we have found the trail and now we are tracking it.
I also wanted to add that this word usage is curious; "divergent time field" Just search the word Divergent and see the first things that come up. I mean it's not related directly but it is since it's science fiction somewhere in time.
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 17, 2017 16:24:58 GMT -5
OK, so this is funky. I usually do search by image. So went searching for quadrature. Look at some of these images for optical quadrature encoders and others on your own but check this link out. www.mcmanis.com/chuck/robotics/projects/encoders/index.htmlLook at the image designs. It's like alarm bells should be going off. How many times have we seen similar images? Like in the vein of they tell you things. So like the ancient TV off the air image, then the SS black Sun image, then the crop circles. There's too much for this to be an accident. Rate Encoders with 30 degree and 10 degree increments. Quadrature Encoder 2 Bit Binary Encoder 4 Bit Gray Code Encoder
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 17, 2017 16:39:21 GMT -5
divergent as opposed to convergent
remember the original definition of time is movement, but linear movement is hard to quantify, and everything spins in the universe, so time is defined as spin. electron orbits, planet, galaxy, whatever so imagine a spinning ring of air, now imagine a tornado, it is still spinning, but small at the start and gets bigger as it rises so it is a divergent time field, or divergent spin. it could be like a tornado, or could be entirely flat in that it would spin at the center and get larger outward. so it is an outward spiral (and assuming that the other polarity of electricity is less or more of an outward spiral. does not seem like an inward spiral, but guess it could be) so you have a tiny point that it starts at. and this is why you can find the point source of an electric field,
then go look at magnetism and you can never identify a point source because it has none.
remember that each dimension is literally made out of the previous dimensions that made me wonder what the first dimension was made out of, pretty sure that it is all self defined, just like math is. and it is there just because it is possible for it to be there.
|
|
|
Post by jhpace1 on Jan 17, 2017 17:06:26 GMT -5
Given the history of German scientists and the Nazi Bell, I would recommend caution, spacecase0. And shielding. Start with postage-stamp-sized models first, and invest in some heavy lead shielding and/or remote waldoes and such. You really shouldn't be closer than 10 feet/3 meters from the first high-voltage tests.
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 17, 2017 21:09:20 GMT -5
I guess that fortunately I don't seem to have a high voltage power supply at the moment my last one was leaking transformer oil and I have yet to fix it. (not even sure where to get transformer oil now) will likely build another type anyway, the broken one does + and - 150KV at the same time at 2mA seems like I would need more voltage than that anyway, reports I have seen show that 300KV is likely not enough, and with that little current, that voltage bleeds off pretty quick
I have a radiation detector, I can check for x rays and make sure I am not hurting myself (in was I know)
also I have set up a device very similar to this, had the magnetic field (seemed to do noting to it) and counter rotating electric fields (at 75KV or maybe a bit more...), but it was mechanical spinning of the charges and not electrically switched into capacitors it did some pretty strange things to people, but I am just fine think it made the same fields in a neutron, one the size of a room, and one that I was inside. (the disks were about 18 inches diameter) it did make copper wire have zero resistance, but that effect slowly faded over about 4 years. and it messed with watches, made them click off time kind of random on the level of the seconds, but the average was the same. (digital and mechanical did the same thing) and whatever state you walked into the area with, it would amplify it. (I got pretty good at being stable practicing with it) it did tap gravity just a bit, but the direction was random did not make any standard radiation modern electronics that uses timing (like digital displays) would not function much at all.
and shielding did nothing to stop the field it made. and the field it made also kept going after it was shut down and removed from the room. a copy of the field also remained around the device. and they appeared to be linked like in quantum entailment (made range on the cordless phone fantastic (but not while it was running))
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 19, 2017 1:24:00 GMT -5
Good points all round. I was just struck by the images of analog quadrature encoders. Read what it says about these degree rate encoder. It's possible that these capacitors are like this. That they are a kind of analog rate encoders. www.mcmanis.com/chuck/robotics/projects/encoders/enc_30degree.htmwww.mcmanis.com/chuck/robotics/projects/encoders/enc_10degree.htmDoes that kind of make sense given what you Said Spacecase0? If they controlled the charges to rotate around the 48 segments while exposing it to a large magnetic field? That almost seems to make more sense. What are your thoughts? Oh, and hows this for Universe Intervention. I come out of Lowe's hardware store this afternoon and lying on the ground in front of me is a round donut magnet. Now what are the odds? I've been wondering how this could be anything else, and I just have to think this isn't accidental. I mean isn't that a little far out to be accidental? Pushing it is what I'd say. Jhpace1 is right about caution: The Nazi's had guys melting. I don't think the Indiana Jones melting Nazi's was just another coincidental happening.
|
|