|
Post by gambeir on Jan 19, 2017 2:26:38 GMT -5
OK, well I do have a couple pointers. Fascinating reading here at Grey falcon...if you get time read the part near the bottom about the German A-bomb project. Now who was it that actually won WWII? Who won the last war? Yea, some pretty interesting stuff there. bell.greyfalcon.us/Kammler.htmNow then: This extract is near the top of the page at the link above. Titled- Extract from: "The Hunt For Zero Point: One Man's Journey To Discover The Biggest Secret Since The Invention Of The Atom Bomb" by Nick Cook But there was more. A Polish source told me the extraordinary story of 'The Bell'. Experiments had been taking place in a mine close to the Czech border. They involved feeding large doses of electricity into an underground chamber where a bell-shaped device emitted a pale blue light. Five scientists exposed to the device had died of side-effects. Word had it that they were investigating some kind of anti-gravitational effect. The Bell, which was about the height of a man and glowed during testing, was made of hard, heavy metal, filled with a violet mercury-like substance. This metallic liquid was stored in a flask, encased in lead three centimeters thick. Experiments always took place under a thick ceramic cover and involved the rapid spinning of two cylinders in opposite directions. The chamber in which the experiments took place was deep below ground. Only The Bell itself was preserved after a series of tests, each lasting about one minute. Even the room was destroyed and rebuilt. Various plants, and animals such as frogs, mice and rats, were exposed to The Bell's sphere of influence. Rapid decay set in and people who helped conduct the experiments suffered from sleep problems, memory loss and muscle spasms. One of the terms used was 'vortex compression'. Another was 'magnetic fields separation'. Both were associated with antigravity. A Pale Blue Light is "Cherenkov Radiation" Particles moving faster than light speed in water produce Cherenkov Radiation. Water is about 18 times denser than air. If you start to see blue light in air, then what? If the Nazi's were seeing this, what then? Ubber HD image of such light in a reactor. i.imgur.com/LQCdSYD.jpgWhat is Cherenkov Radiation? www.theloquitur.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/NewsBriefsIsue19-1024x874.jpgimages.slideplayer.com/14/4499653/slides/slide_19.jpgslideplayer.com/slide/4499653/Scroll down to read a more clear presentation. and here as well. hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Relativ/einvel.htmlThis may be useful to just take a peek at the images. www.saburchill.com/physics/images5/191103002.jpgimage.slidesharecdn.com/x-raysraiuniversity-ppt-140801001829-phpapp01/95/btech-sem-i-engineering-physics-uiv-chapter-2xrays-13-638.jpg?cb=1420608933en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermionic_emissionwww.saburchill.com/physics/chapters2/0087.html
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 19, 2017 16:45:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 19, 2017 22:58:02 GMT -5
I went through 4 years of physic at a university took me years to get that bias and wrong ideas out of my head I remember asking then about one experiment I had run, they told me the experiment was wrong. not that I had got the results wrong or misinterpreted what happened wrong, but that you should never build that hardware for that experiment in the first place.
I am well aware of how to make x rays avoiding the use of heavy metals is ideal, but a bit hard to do when you have to use bismuth
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 20, 2017 14:41:17 GMT -5
I went through 4 years of physic at a university took me years to get that bias and wrong ideas out of my head I remember asking then about one experiment I had run, they told me the experiment was wrong. not that I had got the results wrong or misinterpreted what happened wrong, but that you should never build that hardware for that experiment in the first place. I am well aware of how to make x rays avoiding the use of heavy metals is ideal, but a bit hard to do when you have to use bismuth I already knew you had that background so it's no surprise to me that you already knew about the information I posted. I just like that site and the way it is laid out. I do find that site very clear and intuitive: I like it a lot and it is is so well laid out and easy to follow that finding information is a snap in my mind. So it's like a fall back for reference. I find it a very useful site to refer to, and here's why: My formal scientific education is in the field of criminal investigation. Investigation is really about a methodology that's based on a scientific concept of discovery. We humans are the arbiters of truth. The scientific process does not determine truth. People determine truth. That's why we have courts. We are given in this site the entire "story line" of conventional science. In this story is an explanation for our reality. It is a more complex and involved story than those of the past. It is a a better and more believable story but it still has problems. When these problems become serious issues the solution has been to undertake a campaign of tampering, intimidation, obfuscation, and other criminal activities which in any real criminal case would result in arrest. After such actions, in any real investigation, no real investigator would take the suspects stories seriously or as anything other than obfuscations and obstructions. Any good physical expert (*physicist for example) can take evidence and create a plausible explanation for it's existence, or why it is what it is, and so and so forth. The question is; are they telling the truth, or are they creating a plausible story line to mislead the investigator? Every detective understands how this works. In any investigation it isn't that you don't construct a hypothesis to explain the evidence, because you do, but what we don't do is to accept as truth the explanation for evidence by a suspect. The job of the investigator is to discover truth, and you don't do that by accepting the theories and stories offered by suspects. What is fracturing the belief that science has answers and is real knowledge is their own denial of alternative ideas as plausible. There's a reason for this naturally, and any investigator can see it quite clearly; that to have to re-evaluate the existing paradigm means defeat, it means they got it wrong, at least that's what they seem to think and they can't allow that. Never is this potentially more true than in quantum physics. I like that they have a page with links on failures of classical physics, and then they have the quantum explanations for these. hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.htmlSo as in any investigation you look at the suspects explanations to see if they measure up to your "hunch." The problem is that it is also dangerous because there is a program in the explanation which is a bit like witchcraft or voodoo. You start reading their material and before you know it you're one of them, and the thing is, there's no reason for being one of them but you feel yourself being pulled away.
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 20, 2017 22:11:24 GMT -5
so they made the jump form classical physics to quantum physics, but now can't imagine making that jump again. sounds like they just don't like the unknown
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 23, 2017 17:37:13 GMT -5
so they made the jump form classical physics to quantum physics, but now can't imagine making that jump again. sounds like they just don't like the unknown Sorry about the slow reply. I got caught up in business the other day. Lets not get bogged down by too much information which I'm good at doing. Let's try to stay with some real experimenting. Like some show of results, like a loss of weight, or possibly other effects like vanishing would be a good indication that there is some substance to the information we have collected. About what you said; human nature is to assume that the past is like an old used tire; worn out and not worth much. So it's not surprising that the majority don't think to look to the past efforts of people like Smith for a new beginning. I don't understand it like you do, but it is coming into focus for me more, and makes sense more and more. So ya know I posted that other stuff about rate modulation on the other forum. I'm trying to figure out how a person might go about applying a set of fields to create a distortion in the time field. It just seems there must be more going on. Do you think the bismuth, crystals, and magnetic field could be all there is to this? When I look at the capacitor layout it just suggests that there is more going on. www.mcmanis.com/chuck/robotics/projects/encoders/enc_10degree.htmAlso you both kept thinking the way the capacitor plates are layered with the angle. Any other thoughts about that? Have you done any research on crystal growth in metals? I haven't yet, but will later in the week. Also, do you know of any certain instances were rocks were observed floating or levitating as has been rumored.
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 23, 2017 21:38:43 GMT -5
been working on this for more than 20 years, a day or so means nothing, just hope that no one gets to board to wait for results that might be far out
I read the Smith book 4 times and took notes to understand part of what he said. that resonant fractals website guy asked the questions I failed to ask when reading, he showed me lots more.
first ask what kind of time field are you looking for ? DC or AC ? communications only requires a fluctuation of time, but messing with gravity takes what would be the same as direct current it would seem that all you need to mess with the time field is a DC current on top of a pulsing current in an inductor ever wonder why it is so hard to shield the RF noise from a switching power supply ? that is the core element in it at work. tesla used pulsing DC through the primary of the coil. not many reproductions use DC, and that is why they fail. why did he bother to change the AC to DC ? it is not like it was easy to do then (or now) now all this makes a changing time wave, so it will not mess with gravity unless you couple it with something else (like a crystal in resonance) but that is rather hard to figure out the frequencies for all that.
capacitors with one plate larger than the other will make thrust toward the smaller plate (polarity changes nothing), the the effect is short, it decays pretty fast and the counter rotating switching of that would make thrust up with out any twisting force...
bismuth is an odd one, pretty sure I need testing to figure out any of that I know some, but sure not lots about crystal growth in metals
have seen reports of rocks levitating, but have not yet reproduced it, would love more info on how it is suppose to be done
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 25, 2017 13:39:01 GMT -5
been working on this for more than 20 years, a day or so means nothing, just hope that no one gets to board to wait for results that might be far out I read the Smith book 4 times and took notes to understand part of what he said. that resonant fractals website guy asked the questions I failed to ask when reading, he showed me lots more. first ask what kind of time field are you looking for ? DC or AC ? communications only requires a fluctuation of time, but messing with gravity takes what would be the same as direct current it would seem that all you need to mess with the time field is a DC current on top of a pulsing current in an inductor ever wonder why it is so hard to shield the RF noise from a switching power supply ? that is the core element in it at work. tesla used pulsing DC through the primary of the coil. not many reproductions use DC, and that is why they fail. why did he bother to change the AC to DC ? it is not like it was easy to do then (or now) now all this makes a changing time wave, so it will not mess with gravity unless you couple it with something else (like a crystal in resonance) but that is rather hard to figure out the frequencies for all that. capacitors with one plate larger than the other will make thrust toward the smaller plate (polarity changes nothing), the the effect is short, it decays pretty fast and the counter rotating switching of that would make thrust up with out any twisting force... bismuth is an odd one, pretty sure I need testing to figure out any of that I know some, but sure not lots about crystal growth in metals have seen reports of rocks levitating, but have not yet reproduced it, would love more info on how it is suppose to be done I feel we are on the right track and that you have enough understanding to make it happen if we have the right path. I'm going to have to print off Smith's work and just go through it but what you're saying makes sense. One thing we can do is review the quasi-history surrounding this general topic. For example the Philadelphia Experiment. There might be some clues to consider in that story. I'll have to review it once more but the primary things which come to mind involve the fact that the ship was made from the new process arc welding that employed bismuth in the welds to keep them softened so that they wouldn't become brittle in arctic waters, and the other was that the ship had degaussing cables surrounding the ship for mine protection. "Degaussing is the process of decreasing or eliminating a remnant magnetic field." Could it also become a way to do the opposite? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DegaussingBismuth is a known diamagnet metal of course. I think that the real reason it was used is because it is that, and it grows crystals naturally, so there was the ability to manipulate the metal to form the structure of the seed material. Now last night I was listening to a recorded interview with Lt. Colonel Wendelle C. Stevens and he started talking about metal samples from an alien ship that he was given and had tested. He states that the hull of the alien ship is made of Gold, Copper, and Silver, but these materials are not simply mixed but are created in a vacuum by cold fusion which we don't have the technology to replicate, and that these metals had a crystal structure unique because of the way they were assembled, not like simple mixing of molten matter. Now I've got to relisten to this part and take some notes, but he does talk about the crystal structure, how this structure also exhibited a resonance to mental control. which the alien greys use to control their ships, but that this metal is extremely good at carrying electrical power. Like it sounds to me like what he is actually describing is a kind of room temp superconductive metal. I think the important thing is we are getting repeating messages here. Bismuth, Crystals, Magnetic Fields, Electricity. Maybe what happens with the mixing of these materials is some kind of room temp superconductivity once you get it right.
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 26, 2017 19:15:38 GMT -5
more on pulsed DC www.thingiverse.com/thing:2046974if it does make a time field, then I don't think the people doing it know what is going on, I wonder if tesla understood it
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 28, 2017 20:59:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 28, 2017 22:00:46 GMT -5
this is a pretty good overview of the homopolar generator u2.lege.net/cetinbal/faradaydisk.htmI thought I had a copy of THE HOMOPOLAR HANDBOOK, but went and looked and can't find it, but then my books are a mess right now (have not yet fixed the chaos caused by moving) I know what the book looks like, not sure why I can't find it, but maybe it is still in storage or got loaned out will go reading the links you gave, and so far they seem pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 29, 2017 11:08:12 GMT -5
the link here amasci.com/freenrg/n-mach.html has a picture of what they call a cylindrical homopolar generator, I think you need spacing between the 2 south magnets shown, but that design should get rid of the friction on the brushes on the outside of the disk, and that friction is what everyone says makes these not work well or at all. you could also just keep stacking them in series. and so you don't get back torque, I would run the return current down the middle of the spinning shaft. now when thinking about how to actually build it, you run into a few issues, any ideas how to build it ? or how big to build it ? I can't decide on inches across (the size of a single magnet), or many foot across so it works better (much harder to get magnets)
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 30, 2017 4:56:47 GMT -5
the link here amasci.com/freenrg/n-mach.html has a picture of what they call a cylindrical homopolar generator, I think you need spacing between the 2 south magnets shown, but that design should get rid of the friction on the brushes on the outside of the disk, and that friction is what everyone says makes these not work well or at all. you could also just keep stacking them in series. and so you don't get back torque, I would run the return current down the middle of the spinning shaft. now when thinking about how to actually build it, you run into a few issues, any ideas how to build it ? or how big to build it ? I can't decide on inches across (the size of a single magnet), or many foot across so it works better (much harder to get magnets) Yea, well I've been thinking about this issue. Obviously there's a lot more to homopolar generators than first meets the eye, and yes that is a good link with good info at u2.lege.net/cetinbal/faradaydisk.htm I've got it bookmarked but with so many it's good you keep it handy. Now if you look near the bottom of the page at the following link amasci.com/freenrg/n-mach.html there are links to two PDF by Don Lancaster. Here's why, look at the picture from Amasci.com in the link below amasci.com/freenrg/N-FIELD2.GIFIf you can read the text it asks if spinning magnets make these fields? In Don Lancaster's PDF's in the links underneath he addresses some of this, but not all of it, and if a spinning magnet makes these fields then there's something weird going on since Lancaster seems to show that a spinning magnet should not have any motion to the fields. Might make more sense once you look at the PDF's and specifically fig 3 in the 2nd one. The other thing about the Amasci drawing in the above gif is that it reminds me of the ARV's upper ring, which Mark says he thinks is an antenna. So, now I'm thinking that if there is an antenna then it might somehow be functioning as the pick up, or commutator. Don Lancaster's "Tech Musings" See fig 3 in the 2nd PDF www.tinaja.com/glib/muse117.pdfwww.tinaja.com/glib/muse121.pdf
|
|
|
Post by gambeir on Jan 30, 2017 5:15:37 GMT -5
Here's the link to the weird and unexplained section of Amasci.com amasci.com/weird/unusual/unusual.htmlThis one is about a force field, and what's interesting is how this seems to mimic some of the physics of the rotating air currents from the thunder clouds that were believed to have caused the effects of the Beachcraft Bonnaza to be teleported and which then became the basis for those guys reasearch into field dynamics. You know, the one you cited on the other forum. Can't remember ...oh yea now I remember. these guys...http://www.spacewarpdynamicsllc.com/ More here too www.zamandayolculuk.com/html-3/space_warp_dynamics.htmSo this is similar but obviously different as well since there's a link between the spinning static fields, and in the form of high static plastic connecting giant rolls of plastic warp being collected at a manufacturing plant. Something going on for sure. Force field at 3M factory. Two spinning giant plastic warp rolls *static elect" and a force field. amasci.com/weird/unusual/e-wall.html
|
|
|
Post by spacecase0 on Jan 31, 2017 13:05:41 GMT -5
my next step clearly needs to be to get another high voltage power supply so I can test the spinning electrostatic field thing
|
|